Scientists Have Identified New Genes That Increase The Risk Of Alzheimer's Disease.
Scientists have pinpointed two genes that are linked to Alzheimer's bug and could become targets for rejuvenated treatments for the neurodegenerative condition. Genetic variants appear to entertainment an important take in the development of Alzheimer's since having parents or siblings with the disease increases a person's risk. It is estimated that one of every five persons venerable 65 will develop Alzheimer's disease in their lifetime, the researchers added.
Genome-wide camaraderie studies are increasing scientists' understanding of the biological pathways underlying Alzheimer's disease, which may bring to new therapies, said study author Dr Sudha Seshadri, an fellow-worker professor of neurology at Boston University School of Medicine. For now, society should realize that genes likely interact with other genes and with environmental factors.
Maria Carrillo, senior commander of medical and scientific relations at the Alzheimer's Association, said that "these are the types of studies we paucity in terms of future genetic analysis and things must be confirmed in much larger samples, as was done in this study". The turn up is published in the May 12 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Although it was known that three genes are chargeable for rare cases of Alzheimer's disease that run in families, researchers had been trusty of only one gene, apolipoprotein E (APOE), that increased the risk of the common type of Alzheimer's disease. Using a genome-wide cooperative analysis study of 3006 people with Alzheimer's and 14642 folk without the disease, Seshadri's group identified two other genes associated with Alzheimer's disease, located on chromosomes 2 and 19.
Friday, 25 December 2015
Tuesday, 22 December 2015
Positive Trends In The Treatment Of Leukemia And Lymphoma
Positive Trends In The Treatment Of Leukemia And Lymphoma.
Clinicians have made striking advances in treating blood cancers with bone marrow and blood pedicel cubicle transplants in recent years, significantly reducing the risk of treatment-related complications and death, a brand-new study shows. Between the early 1990s and 2007, there was a 41 percent drop in the overall imperil of death in an analysis of more than 2,500 patients treated at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, a numero uno in the field of blood cancers and other malignancies. Researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, who conducted the study, also notable dramatic decreases in treatment complications such as infection and organ damage.
The ruminate on was published in the Nov 24, 2010 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. "We have made gross strides in understanding this very complex procedure and have yielded quite spectacular results," said con senior author Dr George McDonald, a gastroenterologist with Hutchinson and a professor of remedy at the University of Washington, in Seattle. "This is one of the most complex procedures in medicine and we be aware a lot of complications we didn't before".
Dr Mitchell Smith, head of the lymphoma service at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, feels the regular positive trend - if not the exact numbers - can be extrapolated to other trouble centers. "Most of the things that they've been doing have been generally adopted by most move units, although you do have to be careful because they get a select patient population and they are experts. The smaller centers that don't do as many procedures may not get the extort same results, but the trend is clearly better".
Treatment of high-risk blood cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma was revolutionized in the 1970s with the introduction of allogeneic blood or bone marrow transplantation. Before this advance, patients with blood cancers had far more circumscribed options. The high-dose chemotherapy or dispersal treatments designed to take blood cancer cells (which divide faster than general cells) often damaged or destroyed the patient's bone marrow, leaving it unable to produce the blood cells needed to display oxygen, fight infection and stop bleeding.
Transplanting healthy stem cells from a benefactress into the patient's bone marrow - if all went well - restored its power to produce these vital blood cells. While the remedy met with great success, it also had a lot of serious side effects, including infections, element damage and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which were severe enough to prevent older and frailer patients from undergoing the procedure. But the previous 40 years has seen a lot of improvements in managing these problems.
Clinicians have made striking advances in treating blood cancers with bone marrow and blood pedicel cubicle transplants in recent years, significantly reducing the risk of treatment-related complications and death, a brand-new study shows. Between the early 1990s and 2007, there was a 41 percent drop in the overall imperil of death in an analysis of more than 2,500 patients treated at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, a numero uno in the field of blood cancers and other malignancies. Researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, who conducted the study, also notable dramatic decreases in treatment complications such as infection and organ damage.
The ruminate on was published in the Nov 24, 2010 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. "We have made gross strides in understanding this very complex procedure and have yielded quite spectacular results," said con senior author Dr George McDonald, a gastroenterologist with Hutchinson and a professor of remedy at the University of Washington, in Seattle. "This is one of the most complex procedures in medicine and we be aware a lot of complications we didn't before".
Dr Mitchell Smith, head of the lymphoma service at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, feels the regular positive trend - if not the exact numbers - can be extrapolated to other trouble centers. "Most of the things that they've been doing have been generally adopted by most move units, although you do have to be careful because they get a select patient population and they are experts. The smaller centers that don't do as many procedures may not get the extort same results, but the trend is clearly better".
Treatment of high-risk blood cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma was revolutionized in the 1970s with the introduction of allogeneic blood or bone marrow transplantation. Before this advance, patients with blood cancers had far more circumscribed options. The high-dose chemotherapy or dispersal treatments designed to take blood cancer cells (which divide faster than general cells) often damaged or destroyed the patient's bone marrow, leaving it unable to produce the blood cells needed to display oxygen, fight infection and stop bleeding.
Transplanting healthy stem cells from a benefactress into the patient's bone marrow - if all went well - restored its power to produce these vital blood cells. While the remedy met with great success, it also had a lot of serious side effects, including infections, element damage and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which were severe enough to prevent older and frailer patients from undergoing the procedure. But the previous 40 years has seen a lot of improvements in managing these problems.
Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Treatment Of Severe Acne May Increase Risk Of Suicide Attempts
Treatment Of Severe Acne May Increase Risk Of Suicide Attempts.
Severe acne may significantly proliferation suicide risk, and patients taking isotretinoin (Accutane) for the scrape mould should be monitored for at least a year after treatment ends, Swedish researchers report. "Treatment with Accutane in fact entails an increased risk of suicide attempts," said lead researcher Anders Sundstrom, a pharmacoepidemiologist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. However, hollow caused by the acne, rather than the dope itself, is probably the culprit.
The risk of suicide is very small. There could be one suicide undertake among 2300 people taking Accutane, and that assumes that the drug caused the suicide attempt. For the study, published online Nov 12,2010 in BMJ, Sundstrom's side collected material on 5756 people treated for severe acne with Accutane from 1980 to 1989. The usual age of the men was 22; the average age of women was 27.
Linking these patients to hospitalization and destruction records from 1980 to 2001, they found that 128 of the patients were hospitalized because of a suicide attempt. Suicide attempts increased in the several years before Accutane was started, but the highest jeopardize was seen in the six months after treatment ended, Sundstrom's grouping found.
It's possible that patients whose skin improved became distraught if their social soul didn't benefit, the researchers speculated. Also, Accutane takes time to work and acne can go downhill before it gets better. "It takes a long time to get rid of the acne, and for the self-image to get better might function even a longer time".
Severe acne may significantly proliferation suicide risk, and patients taking isotretinoin (Accutane) for the scrape mould should be monitored for at least a year after treatment ends, Swedish researchers report. "Treatment with Accutane in fact entails an increased risk of suicide attempts," said lead researcher Anders Sundstrom, a pharmacoepidemiologist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. However, hollow caused by the acne, rather than the dope itself, is probably the culprit.
The risk of suicide is very small. There could be one suicide undertake among 2300 people taking Accutane, and that assumes that the drug caused the suicide attempt. For the study, published online Nov 12,2010 in BMJ, Sundstrom's side collected material on 5756 people treated for severe acne with Accutane from 1980 to 1989. The usual age of the men was 22; the average age of women was 27.
Linking these patients to hospitalization and destruction records from 1980 to 2001, they found that 128 of the patients were hospitalized because of a suicide attempt. Suicide attempts increased in the several years before Accutane was started, but the highest jeopardize was seen in the six months after treatment ended, Sundstrom's grouping found.
It's possible that patients whose skin improved became distraught if their social soul didn't benefit, the researchers speculated. Also, Accutane takes time to work and acne can go downhill before it gets better. "It takes a long time to get rid of the acne, and for the self-image to get better might function even a longer time".
Sunday, 13 December 2015
US Doctors Confirm The Correct Solution To The Problem Of Epilepsy
US Doctors Confirm The Correct Solution To The Problem Of Epilepsy.
The humongous more than half of epilepsy patients who have brain surgery to criticize the seizure disorder find it improves their mood and their ability to work and drive, a new work reveals. Meanwhile, a second study also indicates the procedure is safe and effective for patients over 60. "They're both reassuring findings," said Bruce Hermann, helmsman of the Charles Matthews Neuropsychology Lab at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. "Epilepsy is a difficile bedlam to have and live with, coming with a high rate of depression and affecting the ability to drive and work.
And "We always hoped surgery would have reliable effects on patients' life situations, and this research does show that, and shows that the outcomes persist," added Hermann, who was not knotty with the research Dec 2013. Both studies are scheduled to be presented Sunday at the American Epilepsy Society annual joining in Washington, DC Research presented at detailed conferences is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
Affecting about 2,2 million Americans and 65 million ladies and gentlemen globally, epilepsy is a impounding disorder triggered by abnormal nerve cell signaling in the brain, according to the Epilepsy Foundation. More than 1 million Americans with epilepsy experience from treatment-resistant seizures that can hamper their ability to drive, production and learn. Epilepsy is the third most common neurological disorder, after Alzheimer's disease and stroke.
The humongous more than half of epilepsy patients who have brain surgery to criticize the seizure disorder find it improves their mood and their ability to work and drive, a new work reveals. Meanwhile, a second study also indicates the procedure is safe and effective for patients over 60. "They're both reassuring findings," said Bruce Hermann, helmsman of the Charles Matthews Neuropsychology Lab at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. "Epilepsy is a difficile bedlam to have and live with, coming with a high rate of depression and affecting the ability to drive and work.
And "We always hoped surgery would have reliable effects on patients' life situations, and this research does show that, and shows that the outcomes persist," added Hermann, who was not knotty with the research Dec 2013. Both studies are scheduled to be presented Sunday at the American Epilepsy Society annual joining in Washington, DC Research presented at detailed conferences is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
Affecting about 2,2 million Americans and 65 million ladies and gentlemen globally, epilepsy is a impounding disorder triggered by abnormal nerve cell signaling in the brain, according to the Epilepsy Foundation. More than 1 million Americans with epilepsy experience from treatment-resistant seizures that can hamper their ability to drive, production and learn. Epilepsy is the third most common neurological disorder, after Alzheimer's disease and stroke.
Friday, 11 December 2015
Most Articles About Cancer Focused On The Positive Outcome Of Treatment
Most Articles About Cancer Focused On The Positive Outcome Of Treatment.
People often gripe that media reports one-sidedness towards bad news, but when it comes to cancer most newspaper and periodical stories may be overly optimistic, US researchers suggest. The enquiry authors found that articles were more likely to highlight aggressive treatment and survival, with far less notice given to cancer death, treatment failure, adverse events and end-of-life palliative or hospice care, according to their turn up in the March 22 issue of the journal Archives of Internal Medicine.
The University of Pennsylvania span analyzed 436 cancer-related stories published in eight large newspapers and five popular magazines between 2005 and 2007. The articles were most likely to focus on breast cancer (35 percent) or prostate cancer (nearly 15 percent), while 20 percent discussed cancer in general.
There were 140 stories (32 percent) that highlighted patients surviving or being cured of cancer, 33 stories (7,6 percent) that dealt with one or more patients who were at death's door or had died of cancer, and 10 articles (2,3 percent) that focused on both survival and death, the examination authors noted. "It is surprising that few articles about dying and in extremis considering that half of all patients diagnosed as having cancer will not survive," wrote Jessica Fishman and colleagues.
So "The findings are also surprising given that scientists, media critics and the put popular repeatedly criticize the news for focusing on death". Among the other findings.
Only 13 percent (57 articles) mentioned that some cancers are irremediable and hostile cancer treatments may not extend life. Less than one-third (131 articles) mentioned the voiding side effects associated with cancer treatments (such as nausea, pain or hair loss). While more than half (249 articles, or 57 percent) reported on warlike treatments exclusively, only two discussed end-of-life be concerned exclusively and only 11 reported on both aggressive treatments and end-of-life care.
People often gripe that media reports one-sidedness towards bad news, but when it comes to cancer most newspaper and periodical stories may be overly optimistic, US researchers suggest. The enquiry authors found that articles were more likely to highlight aggressive treatment and survival, with far less notice given to cancer death, treatment failure, adverse events and end-of-life palliative or hospice care, according to their turn up in the March 22 issue of the journal Archives of Internal Medicine.
The University of Pennsylvania span analyzed 436 cancer-related stories published in eight large newspapers and five popular magazines between 2005 and 2007. The articles were most likely to focus on breast cancer (35 percent) or prostate cancer (nearly 15 percent), while 20 percent discussed cancer in general.
There were 140 stories (32 percent) that highlighted patients surviving or being cured of cancer, 33 stories (7,6 percent) that dealt with one or more patients who were at death's door or had died of cancer, and 10 articles (2,3 percent) that focused on both survival and death, the examination authors noted. "It is surprising that few articles about dying and in extremis considering that half of all patients diagnosed as having cancer will not survive," wrote Jessica Fishman and colleagues.
So "The findings are also surprising given that scientists, media critics and the put popular repeatedly criticize the news for focusing on death". Among the other findings.
Only 13 percent (57 articles) mentioned that some cancers are irremediable and hostile cancer treatments may not extend life. Less than one-third (131 articles) mentioned the voiding side effects associated with cancer treatments (such as nausea, pain or hair loss). While more than half (249 articles, or 57 percent) reported on warlike treatments exclusively, only two discussed end-of-life be concerned exclusively and only 11 reported on both aggressive treatments and end-of-life care.
Monday, 7 December 2015
IVF Increases The The Risk Of Thrombosis
IVF Increases The The Risk Of Thrombosis.
Women who became in a family way through in vitro fertilization (IVF) may have an increased hazard of developing blood clots and potentially devastating artery blockage, Swedish investigators suggest. Although the risk remains small, the discrepancy are especially high during the first trimester compared to women who become pregnant naturally, the researchers said. Blood clots - called venous thromboembolism - can demonstrate in the leg veins and intervene free, traveling to the lungs and blocking a main artery. This condition, called pulmonary embolism, can cause hindrance breathing and even death.
So "There is an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis amidst women pregnant after IVF," said lead researcher Dr Peter Henriksson, a professor of internal c physic at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. "Embolism is the leading cause of devoted mortality during pregnancy. The diagnosis can be elusive, so physicians should be aware of this risk to facilitate the diagnosis".
The jeopardize of clotting during pregnancy isn't confined to women who undergo IVF, another experts said. "Any pregnancy carries a jeopardy of clotting," said Dr Avner Hershlag, principal of the Center for Human Reproduction at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, NY. This is because hormones, principally estrogen, increase during pregnancy. "This changes what we call the clotting cascade. There are many factors in blood clotting that can be distressed by hormones - especially estrogen".
In addition, the enlarging uterus puts intimidation on pelvic blood vessels, which can lead to clotting. Some women are advised to guide their movement to reduce the risk of clotting. Although it's unclear why women who stand IVF have a greater risk of clotting, Hershlag speculates that it could be due to fertility treatments that further estrogen even beyond levels normally associated with pregnancy.
Women who became in a family way through in vitro fertilization (IVF) may have an increased hazard of developing blood clots and potentially devastating artery blockage, Swedish investigators suggest. Although the risk remains small, the discrepancy are especially high during the first trimester compared to women who become pregnant naturally, the researchers said. Blood clots - called venous thromboembolism - can demonstrate in the leg veins and intervene free, traveling to the lungs and blocking a main artery. This condition, called pulmonary embolism, can cause hindrance breathing and even death.
So "There is an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis amidst women pregnant after IVF," said lead researcher Dr Peter Henriksson, a professor of internal c physic at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. "Embolism is the leading cause of devoted mortality during pregnancy. The diagnosis can be elusive, so physicians should be aware of this risk to facilitate the diagnosis".
The jeopardize of clotting during pregnancy isn't confined to women who undergo IVF, another experts said. "Any pregnancy carries a jeopardy of clotting," said Dr Avner Hershlag, principal of the Center for Human Reproduction at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, NY. This is because hormones, principally estrogen, increase during pregnancy. "This changes what we call the clotting cascade. There are many factors in blood clotting that can be distressed by hormones - especially estrogen".
In addition, the enlarging uterus puts intimidation on pelvic blood vessels, which can lead to clotting. Some women are advised to guide their movement to reduce the risk of clotting. Although it's unclear why women who stand IVF have a greater risk of clotting, Hershlag speculates that it could be due to fertility treatments that further estrogen even beyond levels normally associated with pregnancy.
Thursday, 3 December 2015
The Risk Of Heart Attack Or A Stroke Doubles With Diabetes
The Risk Of Heart Attack Or A Stroke Doubles With Diabetes.
Diabetes appears to spit and image the imperil of dying from a heart attack, stitch or other heart condition, a new study finds. The researchers implicate diabetes in one of every 10 deaths from cardiovascular disease, or about 325000 deaths a year in industrialized countries. "We have known for decades that commonality with diabetes are more in all probability to have heart attacks," said researcher Nadeem Sarwar, a lecturer in cardiovascular epidemiology at the University of Cambridge in England.
But "In provoke of decades of research, several questions have persisted as to how much higher this chance is, whether it's explained by things we already know of, and whether the jeopardize is different in different people". These findings highlight the need to prevent and dominate diabetes, a disease in which blood sugar levels are too high.
The report is published in the June 26 pour of The Lancet, and Sarwar plans to present the findings at the American Diabetes Association's meeting, June 25 to 29 in Orlando, Fla. For the study, Sarwar's set sedate data on 698,782 people who participated in an international consortium. The participants were followed for 10 years through 102 surveys done in 25 countries.
The researchers found that having diabetes nearly doubled the hazard of trial from various diseases involving the heart and blood vessels. But this risk was only partially due to the usual culprits - cholesterol, blood tension and obesity.
Diabetes appears to spit and image the imperil of dying from a heart attack, stitch or other heart condition, a new study finds. The researchers implicate diabetes in one of every 10 deaths from cardiovascular disease, or about 325000 deaths a year in industrialized countries. "We have known for decades that commonality with diabetes are more in all probability to have heart attacks," said researcher Nadeem Sarwar, a lecturer in cardiovascular epidemiology at the University of Cambridge in England.
But "In provoke of decades of research, several questions have persisted as to how much higher this chance is, whether it's explained by things we already know of, and whether the jeopardize is different in different people". These findings highlight the need to prevent and dominate diabetes, a disease in which blood sugar levels are too high.
The report is published in the June 26 pour of The Lancet, and Sarwar plans to present the findings at the American Diabetes Association's meeting, June 25 to 29 in Orlando, Fla. For the study, Sarwar's set sedate data on 698,782 people who participated in an international consortium. The participants were followed for 10 years through 102 surveys done in 25 countries.
The researchers found that having diabetes nearly doubled the hazard of trial from various diseases involving the heart and blood vessels. But this risk was only partially due to the usual culprits - cholesterol, blood tension and obesity.
Anesthesia Affects The Heart
Anesthesia Affects The Heart.
More be connected about the safety of a common anesthetic has been raised in a callow study. Patients who received the anesthesia drug etomidate during surgery might be at increased chance for cardiovascular problems or death, according to the study, which was published in the December issue of the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia. An accompanying column in the journal said the findings add to growing concerns about the use of the drug. The examine compared about 2100 patients who received etomidate and about 5200 patients who received another intravenous anesthetic called propofol.
All of the patients in the memorize underwent surgery that didn't imply the heart. Compared to those who received propofol, patients who received etomidate had a significantly higher endanger of death within 30 days after surgery, according to a journal news release. The risk was 6,5 percent in the etomidate batch and 2,5 percent in the propofol group, said study conductor Dr Ryu Komatsu, of the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
More be connected about the safety of a common anesthetic has been raised in a callow study. Patients who received the anesthesia drug etomidate during surgery might be at increased chance for cardiovascular problems or death, according to the study, which was published in the December issue of the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia. An accompanying column in the journal said the findings add to growing concerns about the use of the drug. The examine compared about 2100 patients who received etomidate and about 5200 patients who received another intravenous anesthetic called propofol.
All of the patients in the memorize underwent surgery that didn't imply the heart. Compared to those who received propofol, patients who received etomidate had a significantly higher endanger of death within 30 days after surgery, according to a journal news release. The risk was 6,5 percent in the etomidate batch and 2,5 percent in the propofol group, said study conductor Dr Ryu Komatsu, of the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
Wednesday, 2 December 2015
On The First Day Of New Year Kills More Babies Than Any Other Day
On The First Day Of New Year Kills More Babies Than Any Other Day.
A remodelled inspect finds that more babies pass away of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the United States on New Year's Day than any other daytime of the year. It's not clear why, but researchers suspect it has something to do with parents who gulp heavily the night before and put their children in jeopardy. "Alcohol-influenced adults are less able to protect children in their care. We're saying the same sentiment is happening with SIDS: They're also less likely to protect the baby from it," said scrutiny author David Phillips, a sociologist. "It seems as if alcohol is a gamble factor. We just need to find out what makes it a risk factor".
SIDS kills an estimated 2500 babies in the United States each year. Some researchers characterize genetic problems donate to most cases, with the risk boosted when babies sleep on their stomachs. Phillips is a professor of sociology at the University of California at San Diego who studies when such deaths happen and why.
He said he became offbeat how the choices made by parents may stir SIDS and launched the new study, which appears in the current issue of the fortnightly Addiction. Researchers analyzed a database of 129090 deaths from SIDS from 1973-2006 and 295151 other infant deaths during that span period. They found that the highest number of deaths from SIDS occur on New Year's Day: They nail by almost a third above the number of deaths that would be expected on a winter day.
A remodelled inspect finds that more babies pass away of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the United States on New Year's Day than any other daytime of the year. It's not clear why, but researchers suspect it has something to do with parents who gulp heavily the night before and put their children in jeopardy. "Alcohol-influenced adults are less able to protect children in their care. We're saying the same sentiment is happening with SIDS: They're also less likely to protect the baby from it," said scrutiny author David Phillips, a sociologist. "It seems as if alcohol is a gamble factor. We just need to find out what makes it a risk factor".
SIDS kills an estimated 2500 babies in the United States each year. Some researchers characterize genetic problems donate to most cases, with the risk boosted when babies sleep on their stomachs. Phillips is a professor of sociology at the University of California at San Diego who studies when such deaths happen and why.
He said he became offbeat how the choices made by parents may stir SIDS and launched the new study, which appears in the current issue of the fortnightly Addiction. Researchers analyzed a database of 129090 deaths from SIDS from 1973-2006 and 295151 other infant deaths during that span period. They found that the highest number of deaths from SIDS occur on New Year's Day: They nail by almost a third above the number of deaths that would be expected on a winter day.
Visiting Nurse Improves Intelligence
Visiting Nurse Improves Intelligence.
Poor children get polymath and behavioral benefits from old folks' visits by nurses and other skilled caregivers, new research suggests. The scrutinize included more than 700 poor women and their children in Denver who enrolled in a non-profit program called the Nurse-Family Partnership. This federal program tries to improve outcomes for first-born children of first-time mothers with restricted support.
The goal of the study, which was published online recently in the documentation JAMA Pediatrics, was to determine the effectiveness of using trained "paraprofessionals". These professionals did not need college instruction and they shared many of the same social characteristics of the families they visited. The women in the study were divided into three groups.
Poor children get polymath and behavioral benefits from old folks' visits by nurses and other skilled caregivers, new research suggests. The scrutinize included more than 700 poor women and their children in Denver who enrolled in a non-profit program called the Nurse-Family Partnership. This federal program tries to improve outcomes for first-born children of first-time mothers with restricted support.
The goal of the study, which was published online recently in the documentation JAMA Pediatrics, was to determine the effectiveness of using trained "paraprofessionals". These professionals did not need college instruction and they shared many of the same social characteristics of the families they visited. The women in the study were divided into three groups.
Saturday, 28 November 2015
Some Postmenopausal Women From Breast Cancer Can Protect Hormonal Therapy
Some Postmenopausal Women From Breast Cancer Can Protect Hormonal Therapy.
In a find that seems to marker the prevailing wisdom that any form of hormone replacement psychoanalysis raises the risk of breast cancer, a new look at some old data suggests that estrogen-only hormone group therapy might protect a small subset of postmenopausal women against the disease. "Exogenous estrogen such as hormone analysis is actually protective" in women who have a low risk for developing tit tumors, said study author Dr Joseph Ragaz, a medical oncologist and clinical professor in the School of Population & Public Health at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. With his colleagues, Ragaz took another manner at details from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, a jingoistic trial that has focused on ways to prevent breast and colorectal cancer, as well as sentiment disease and fracture risk, in postmenopausal women.
The team planned to present its findings Thursday at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in Texas. Research presented at medical meetings is not analyzed by home experts, ill-matched studies that appear in peer-reviewed medical journals, and all such findings should be considered preliminary. Launched in 1991, the WHI includes more than 161000 US women between the ages of 50 and 79.
Two groups were area of the thorn in the flesh - women who had had hysterectomies and took estrogen desolate as hormone replacement therapy and a group that took estrogen plus progestin hormone replacement therapy. The mix therapy trial was halted in 2002 after it became clear those women were at increased chance for heart disease and breast cancer.
In the new look at the estrogen-only group "we looked at women who did not have high-risk features". They found that women with no earlier history of benign teat disease had a 43 percent reduction breast cancer risk on estrogen; women with no house history with a first-degree relative with breast cancer had a 32 percent risk reduction and women without past hormone use had a 32 percent reduced risk.
In a find that seems to marker the prevailing wisdom that any form of hormone replacement psychoanalysis raises the risk of breast cancer, a new look at some old data suggests that estrogen-only hormone group therapy might protect a small subset of postmenopausal women against the disease. "Exogenous estrogen such as hormone analysis is actually protective" in women who have a low risk for developing tit tumors, said study author Dr Joseph Ragaz, a medical oncologist and clinical professor in the School of Population & Public Health at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. With his colleagues, Ragaz took another manner at details from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, a jingoistic trial that has focused on ways to prevent breast and colorectal cancer, as well as sentiment disease and fracture risk, in postmenopausal women.
The team planned to present its findings Thursday at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in Texas. Research presented at medical meetings is not analyzed by home experts, ill-matched studies that appear in peer-reviewed medical journals, and all such findings should be considered preliminary. Launched in 1991, the WHI includes more than 161000 US women between the ages of 50 and 79.
Two groups were area of the thorn in the flesh - women who had had hysterectomies and took estrogen desolate as hormone replacement therapy and a group that took estrogen plus progestin hormone replacement therapy. The mix therapy trial was halted in 2002 after it became clear those women were at increased chance for heart disease and breast cancer.
In the new look at the estrogen-only group "we looked at women who did not have high-risk features". They found that women with no earlier history of benign teat disease had a 43 percent reduction breast cancer risk on estrogen; women with no house history with a first-degree relative with breast cancer had a 32 percent risk reduction and women without past hormone use had a 32 percent reduced risk.
Monday, 23 November 2015
US Doctors Have Found A New Way To Boost Fertility
US Doctors Have Found A New Way To Boost Fertility.
Over the years four decades, the reproach of twin, triplet and other multiple births has soared, in general the result of fertility treatments, a new study finds. In 2011, more than one-third of link births and more than three-quarters of triplets or higher in the United States resulted from fertility treatments. But as the mode for certain treatments - like fertility drugs - has waned, replaced by in vitro fertilization (IVF), so has the berate of multiple births, the researchers say.
And "Data shows that when it comes to multiple births in the United States, the numbers be there substantial," said paramount researcher Dr Eli Adashi, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Brown University. But the double birth rate may have plateaued and the birth rate of more than twins has been dropping: "While IVF is a agent here, non-IVF technologies seem to be the main offender.
The main hazard of multiple birth is prematurity. "That's a huge issue for infants. "It remains the assurance of the medical establishment that we are all better off with singleton babies born at term as opposed to multiples that are often born preterm". The scene is changing toward greater use of IVF and elimination of non-IVF fertility treatments, said Dr Avner Hershlag, leading of the Center for Human Reproduction at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, NY "With IVF you have pally to full control over the outcome in terms of multiple births, whereas with fertility drugs, you escape control once you trigger ovulation," said Hershlag, who was not or on of the new study.
Over the years, IVF has become more efficient and experts can almost predict the claim chance of a pregnancy. In addition, insurance companies are more willing to pay for several rounds of IVF using fewer embryos. They are beginning to earn that reducing multiple births cuts the huge costs of neonatal care. Still, too many companies put a lid on the number of rounds of IVF they will pay for.
Yet, it's far cheaper to settlement for IVF than to pay for the care in the neonatal intensive care unit, Hershlag trenchant out. "The preemie is the most expensive type of patient in the hospital". The late study, published Dec 5, 2013 in the New England Journal of Medicine, estimated the total of multiple births using data from 1962 to 1966 - before any fertility treatments were at one's fingertips - comparing them to data from 1971 through 2011. To determine the contribution of non-IVF procedures, the researchers subtracted IVF multiple births from the add number of multiple births.
Over the years four decades, the reproach of twin, triplet and other multiple births has soared, in general the result of fertility treatments, a new study finds. In 2011, more than one-third of link births and more than three-quarters of triplets or higher in the United States resulted from fertility treatments. But as the mode for certain treatments - like fertility drugs - has waned, replaced by in vitro fertilization (IVF), so has the berate of multiple births, the researchers say.
And "Data shows that when it comes to multiple births in the United States, the numbers be there substantial," said paramount researcher Dr Eli Adashi, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Brown University. But the double birth rate may have plateaued and the birth rate of more than twins has been dropping: "While IVF is a agent here, non-IVF technologies seem to be the main offender.
The main hazard of multiple birth is prematurity. "That's a huge issue for infants. "It remains the assurance of the medical establishment that we are all better off with singleton babies born at term as opposed to multiples that are often born preterm". The scene is changing toward greater use of IVF and elimination of non-IVF fertility treatments, said Dr Avner Hershlag, leading of the Center for Human Reproduction at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, NY "With IVF you have pally to full control over the outcome in terms of multiple births, whereas with fertility drugs, you escape control once you trigger ovulation," said Hershlag, who was not or on of the new study.
Over the years, IVF has become more efficient and experts can almost predict the claim chance of a pregnancy. In addition, insurance companies are more willing to pay for several rounds of IVF using fewer embryos. They are beginning to earn that reducing multiple births cuts the huge costs of neonatal care. Still, too many companies put a lid on the number of rounds of IVF they will pay for.
Yet, it's far cheaper to settlement for IVF than to pay for the care in the neonatal intensive care unit, Hershlag trenchant out. "The preemie is the most expensive type of patient in the hospital". The late study, published Dec 5, 2013 in the New England Journal of Medicine, estimated the total of multiple births using data from 1962 to 1966 - before any fertility treatments were at one's fingertips - comparing them to data from 1971 through 2011. To determine the contribution of non-IVF procedures, the researchers subtracted IVF multiple births from the add number of multiple births.
Friday, 20 November 2015
Use Of Smokeless Tobacco Increases The Risk Of Cancer, Stroke, Heart Attack
Use Of Smokeless Tobacco Increases The Risk Of Cancer, Stroke, Heart Attack.
Many smokers in the United States and its territories also use smokeless tobacco products such as snuff and munch tobacco, a combine that makes quitting much more difficult, a unusual federal memorize shows. Researchers analyzed data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and found that the assess of smokers who also use smokeless tobacco ranged from 0,9 percent in Puerto Rico to 13,7 percent in Wyoming. "The fighting against tobacco has taken on a new dimension as parts of the countryside report high rates of cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among adults. The example data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveal disturbing trends in smoking ubiquity as more individuals use multiple tobacco products to satisfy their nicotine addiction," American Heart Association CEO Nancy Brown said in a communication released Thursday.
And "No tobacco produce is safe to consume. The health hazards associated with tobacco use are well-documented and a new American Heart Association policy statement indicates smokeless tobacco products extend the risk of fatal heart attack, fatal stroke and certain cancers". Among the 13 states with the highest rates of smoking, seven also had the highest rates of smokeless tobacco use.
In these states - Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma and West Virginia - at least one of every nine men who smoked cigarettes also reported using smokeless tobacco. The rates in those states ranged from 11,8 percent in Kentucky to 20,8 percent in Arkansas. The form with the highest rank of smokeless tobacco use amidst of age manful smokers was Wyoming (23,4 percent).
Many smokers in the United States and its territories also use smokeless tobacco products such as snuff and munch tobacco, a combine that makes quitting much more difficult, a unusual federal memorize shows. Researchers analyzed data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and found that the assess of smokers who also use smokeless tobacco ranged from 0,9 percent in Puerto Rico to 13,7 percent in Wyoming. "The fighting against tobacco has taken on a new dimension as parts of the countryside report high rates of cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among adults. The example data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveal disturbing trends in smoking ubiquity as more individuals use multiple tobacco products to satisfy their nicotine addiction," American Heart Association CEO Nancy Brown said in a communication released Thursday.
And "No tobacco produce is safe to consume. The health hazards associated with tobacco use are well-documented and a new American Heart Association policy statement indicates smokeless tobacco products extend the risk of fatal heart attack, fatal stroke and certain cancers". Among the 13 states with the highest rates of smoking, seven also had the highest rates of smokeless tobacco use.
In these states - Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma and West Virginia - at least one of every nine men who smoked cigarettes also reported using smokeless tobacco. The rates in those states ranged from 11,8 percent in Kentucky to 20,8 percent in Arkansas. The form with the highest rank of smokeless tobacco use amidst of age manful smokers was Wyoming (23,4 percent).
Thursday, 19 November 2015
Adolescents Who Watch R-Movies Smoke Are Three Times More Often
Adolescents Who Watch R-Movies Smoke Are Three Times More Often.
Teens who are allowed to tend R-rated movies are more inclined to to take up smoking than teens whose parents rod them from viewing mature movie content, according to new research. In fact, the survey authors estimated that if 10- to 14-year-olds were completely restricted from viewing R-rated movies, their imperil of starting to smoke could drop two to threefold. However, the study found that only one in three offspring American teens is restricted from viewing R-rated films, which are restricted at the box office to teens 17 and older unless the lady is accompanied by an adult.
And "When watching popular movies, shaver are exposed to many risk behaviors, including smoking, which is rarely displayed with negative haleness consequences and most often portrayed in a positive manner or glamorized to some extent. Previous studies have shown that adolescents who examine movie smoking are more likely to begin smoking," said the study's lead author, Rebecca de Leeuw, a doctoral schoolchild at Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands.
So "Our findings direct attention to that parental R-rated movie restrictions were directly related to a lower risk of smoking initiation, but also indirectly through changes in children's furor seeking," de Leeuw added. "Sensation seeking is interrelated to a higher risk for smoking onset. However, children with parents who restrict them from watching R-rated movies were less expected to develop higher levels of sensation seeking and, subsequently, at a cut risk for smoking onset".
Findings from the study are scheduled to appear in the January issue of Pediatrics. The meditate on included data from a random sample of 6522 American children between the ages of 10 and 14 years old. The usual age of the children at the start of the study was 12. The children were followed for two years, and given sporadic re-evaluations at 8, 16 and 24 months to watch if they had begun smoking during that time period.
Teens who are allowed to tend R-rated movies are more inclined to to take up smoking than teens whose parents rod them from viewing mature movie content, according to new research. In fact, the survey authors estimated that if 10- to 14-year-olds were completely restricted from viewing R-rated movies, their imperil of starting to smoke could drop two to threefold. However, the study found that only one in three offspring American teens is restricted from viewing R-rated films, which are restricted at the box office to teens 17 and older unless the lady is accompanied by an adult.
And "When watching popular movies, shaver are exposed to many risk behaviors, including smoking, which is rarely displayed with negative haleness consequences and most often portrayed in a positive manner or glamorized to some extent. Previous studies have shown that adolescents who examine movie smoking are more likely to begin smoking," said the study's lead author, Rebecca de Leeuw, a doctoral schoolchild at Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands.
So "Our findings direct attention to that parental R-rated movie restrictions were directly related to a lower risk of smoking initiation, but also indirectly through changes in children's furor seeking," de Leeuw added. "Sensation seeking is interrelated to a higher risk for smoking onset. However, children with parents who restrict them from watching R-rated movies were less expected to develop higher levels of sensation seeking and, subsequently, at a cut risk for smoking onset".
Findings from the study are scheduled to appear in the January issue of Pediatrics. The meditate on included data from a random sample of 6522 American children between the ages of 10 and 14 years old. The usual age of the children at the start of the study was 12. The children were followed for two years, and given sporadic re-evaluations at 8, 16 and 24 months to watch if they had begun smoking during that time period.
Friday, 13 November 2015
Austrian Scientists Have Determined The Effect Of Morphine On Blood Coagulation
Austrian Scientists Have Determined The Effect Of Morphine On Blood Coagulation.
Morphine appears to limit the effectiveness of the commonly second-hand blood-thinning remedy Plavix, which could hamper emergency-room efforts to treat heart attack victims, Austrian researchers report. The decision could create serious dilemmas in the ER, where doctors have to weigh a affection patient's intense pain against the need to break up and prevent blood clots, said Dr Deepak Bhatt, management director of interventional cardiovascular programs at Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, in Boston. "If a indefatigable is having crushing heart pain, you can't just notify them to tough it out, and morphine is the most commonly used medication in that situation," said Bhatt, who was not twisted in the study.
And "Giving them morphine is the humane thing to do, but it could also create delays in care". Doctors will have to be surprisingly careful if a heart attack patient needs to have a stent implanted. Blood thinners are vital in preventing blood clots from forming around the stent. "If that case is unfolding, it requires a little bit of extra thought on the part of the physician whether they want to give that full slug of morphine or not".
About half of the 600000 stent procedures that operate place in the United States each year turn up as the result of a heart attack, angina or other acute coronary syndrome. The Austrian researchers focused on 24 nourishing people who received either a dose of Plavix with an injection of morphine or a placebo drug. Morphine delayed the knack of Plavix (clopidogrel) to thin a patient's blood by an usual of two hours, the researchers said.
Morphine appears to limit the effectiveness of the commonly second-hand blood-thinning remedy Plavix, which could hamper emergency-room efforts to treat heart attack victims, Austrian researchers report. The decision could create serious dilemmas in the ER, where doctors have to weigh a affection patient's intense pain against the need to break up and prevent blood clots, said Dr Deepak Bhatt, management director of interventional cardiovascular programs at Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, in Boston. "If a indefatigable is having crushing heart pain, you can't just notify them to tough it out, and morphine is the most commonly used medication in that situation," said Bhatt, who was not twisted in the study.
And "Giving them morphine is the humane thing to do, but it could also create delays in care". Doctors will have to be surprisingly careful if a heart attack patient needs to have a stent implanted. Blood thinners are vital in preventing blood clots from forming around the stent. "If that case is unfolding, it requires a little bit of extra thought on the part of the physician whether they want to give that full slug of morphine or not".
About half of the 600000 stent procedures that operate place in the United States each year turn up as the result of a heart attack, angina or other acute coronary syndrome. The Austrian researchers focused on 24 nourishing people who received either a dose of Plavix with an injection of morphine or a placebo drug. Morphine delayed the knack of Plavix (clopidogrel) to thin a patient's blood by an usual of two hours, the researchers said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)