Even Easy Brain Concussion Can Lead To Serious Consequences.
Soldiers who be reduced passive brain injuries from blasts have long-term changes in their brains, a inadequate new study suggests. Diagnosing mild brain injuries caused by explosions can be challenging using pedestal CT or MRI scans, the researchers said. For their study, they turned to a notable type of MRI called diffusion tensor imaging. The technology was used to assess the brains of 10 American veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan who had been diagnosed with forgiving traumatizing brain injuries and a comparison group of 10 people without brain injuries.
The average space since the veterans had suffered their brain injuries was a little more than four years. The researchers found that the veterans and the likeness group had significant differences in the brain's white matter, which consists mostly of signal-carrying nerve fibers. These differences were linked with notice problems, delayed memory and poorer psychomotor assess scores among the veterans. "Psychomotor" refers to movement and muscle ability associated with bonkers processes.
Wednesday 12 October 2016
Sunday 9 October 2016
To Get An Interview For A Woman To Be A Better Resume Without A Photo
To Get An Interview For A Woman To Be A Better Resume Without A Photo.
While good-looking men note it easier to sod a ass interview, attractive women may be at a disadvantage, a new study from Israel suggests. Resumes that included photos of fair men were twice as likely to generate requests for an interview, the think over found. But resumes from women that included photos were up to 30 percent less like as not to get a response, whether or not the women were attractive.
That good-looking women were passed over for interviews "was surprising," said swatting leader Bradley Ruffle, an economics researcher and lecturer at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. The determination contradicts a considerable body of research that shows that good-looking people are typically viewed as smarter, kinder and more first-rate than those who are less attractive.
But Daniel S Hamermesh, professor of economics at the University of Texas at Austin, "wasn't perfectly surprised," noting that other studies, including one of his own, have found pulchritude a liability in the workplace. "I call this the 'Bimbo Effect,'" said Hamermesh, considered an arbiter on the association between beauty and the labor market. The current study appears online on the Social Science Research Network.
In Israel, area hunters have the option of including a headshot with their resumes, whereas that is usual in many European countries but taboo in the United States. That made Israel the idyllic testing ground for his research.
To determine whether a job candidate's appearance affects the probability of landing an interview, Ruffle and a colleague mailed 5,312 virtually identical resumes, in pairs, in return to 2,656 advertised job openings in 10 different fields. One take up again included a photo of an attractive man or woman or a plain man or woman; the other had no photo. Almost 400 employers (14,5 percent) responded.
While good-looking men note it easier to sod a ass interview, attractive women may be at a disadvantage, a new study from Israel suggests. Resumes that included photos of fair men were twice as likely to generate requests for an interview, the think over found. But resumes from women that included photos were up to 30 percent less like as not to get a response, whether or not the women were attractive.
That good-looking women were passed over for interviews "was surprising," said swatting leader Bradley Ruffle, an economics researcher and lecturer at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. The determination contradicts a considerable body of research that shows that good-looking people are typically viewed as smarter, kinder and more first-rate than those who are less attractive.
But Daniel S Hamermesh, professor of economics at the University of Texas at Austin, "wasn't perfectly surprised," noting that other studies, including one of his own, have found pulchritude a liability in the workplace. "I call this the 'Bimbo Effect,'" said Hamermesh, considered an arbiter on the association between beauty and the labor market. The current study appears online on the Social Science Research Network.
In Israel, area hunters have the option of including a headshot with their resumes, whereas that is usual in many European countries but taboo in the United States. That made Israel the idyllic testing ground for his research.
To determine whether a job candidate's appearance affects the probability of landing an interview, Ruffle and a colleague mailed 5,312 virtually identical resumes, in pairs, in return to 2,656 advertised job openings in 10 different fields. One take up again included a photo of an attractive man or woman or a plain man or woman; the other had no photo. Almost 400 employers (14,5 percent) responded.
Thursday 6 October 2016
Actions To Reduce The Risk Of Penetration Of Deadly Hospital Infections Through Catheter
Actions To Reduce The Risk Of Penetration Of Deadly Hospital Infections Through Catheter.
Hospitals across the United States are whereas a ease of serious, often heartless infections from catheters placed in patients' necks, called central ancestry catheters, a new report finds. "Health care-associated infections are a significant medical and public healthfulness problem in the United States," Dr Don Wright, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Healthcare Quality in the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said during a c noontide teleconference Thursday.
Bloodstream infections chance when bacteria from the patient's skin or from the environment get into the blood. "These are significant infections that can cause death," said Dr Arjun Srinivasan, the associate director for Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs in CDC's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Central lines can be momentous conduits for these infections. These lines are typically silent for the sickest patients and are usually inserted into the munificent blood vessels of the neck. Once in place, they are used to provide medications and help watchdog patients. "It has been estimated that there are approximately 1,7 million health care-associated infections in hospitals exclusively each and every year, resulting in 100000 lives lost and an additional $30 billion in health attention costs".
In 2009, HHS started a program aimed at eliminating health care-related infections, the experts said. One goal: to draw central line infections by 50 percent by 2013. To this end, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Thursday released its news update on the increase so far.
Hospitals across the United States are whereas a ease of serious, often heartless infections from catheters placed in patients' necks, called central ancestry catheters, a new report finds. "Health care-associated infections are a significant medical and public healthfulness problem in the United States," Dr Don Wright, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Healthcare Quality in the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said during a c noontide teleconference Thursday.
Bloodstream infections chance when bacteria from the patient's skin or from the environment get into the blood. "These are significant infections that can cause death," said Dr Arjun Srinivasan, the associate director for Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs in CDC's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Central lines can be momentous conduits for these infections. These lines are typically silent for the sickest patients and are usually inserted into the munificent blood vessels of the neck. Once in place, they are used to provide medications and help watchdog patients. "It has been estimated that there are approximately 1,7 million health care-associated infections in hospitals exclusively each and every year, resulting in 100000 lives lost and an additional $30 billion in health attention costs".
In 2009, HHS started a program aimed at eliminating health care-related infections, the experts said. One goal: to draw central line infections by 50 percent by 2013. To this end, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Thursday released its news update on the increase so far.
Monday 3 October 2016
Features Of Surgery For Cancer
Features Of Surgery For Cancer.
After chemotherapy, surgery and shedding to probe the original tumor might not benefit women with advanced breast cancer, a new swat shows in Dec 2013. A minority of women with breast cancer discover they have the illness in its later stages, after it has spread to other parts of the body. These patients typically are started on chemotherapy to helper shrink the cancerous growths and slow the disease's progress. Beyond that, doctors have hunger wondered whether it's also a good idea to treat the original breast tumor with surgery or emission even though the cancer has taken root in other organs.
And "Our trial did show there's no benefit of doing surgery," said read author Dr Rajendra Badwe, head of the surgical breast section at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India. It didn't seem to matter if patients were unfledged or old, if their cancer was hormone receptor positive or negative, or if they had a few sites of spreading cancer or a lot. Surgery didn't string out their lives. The study was scheduled for presentation this week at the annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, in Texas.
The results aren't shocking, since experiments in animals performed more than 30 years ago suggested that vicious out the firsthand tumor only egged on cancer at the backup sites. But studies in humans have suggested that removing the original cancer in the bosom may increase survival. Those studies aren't thought to be definitive, however, because they looked back only at what happened after women already underwent treatment. One pundit not involved in the new study also questioned the choice of patients in the previous research.
So "There's a lot of bias with that because you tend to operate on patients you think might do well to begin with," said Dr Stephanie Bernik, head of surgical oncology at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "We positively need more evidence to guide us". To rack up that evidence, researchers randomly assigned 350 women who responded to their initial chemotherapy to one of two courses of treatment. The victory group had surgery followed by radiation to remove the first breast tumor and lymph nodes under the arms.
After chemotherapy, surgery and shedding to probe the original tumor might not benefit women with advanced breast cancer, a new swat shows in Dec 2013. A minority of women with breast cancer discover they have the illness in its later stages, after it has spread to other parts of the body. These patients typically are started on chemotherapy to helper shrink the cancerous growths and slow the disease's progress. Beyond that, doctors have hunger wondered whether it's also a good idea to treat the original breast tumor with surgery or emission even though the cancer has taken root in other organs.
And "Our trial did show there's no benefit of doing surgery," said read author Dr Rajendra Badwe, head of the surgical breast section at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India. It didn't seem to matter if patients were unfledged or old, if their cancer was hormone receptor positive or negative, or if they had a few sites of spreading cancer or a lot. Surgery didn't string out their lives. The study was scheduled for presentation this week at the annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, in Texas.
The results aren't shocking, since experiments in animals performed more than 30 years ago suggested that vicious out the firsthand tumor only egged on cancer at the backup sites. But studies in humans have suggested that removing the original cancer in the bosom may increase survival. Those studies aren't thought to be definitive, however, because they looked back only at what happened after women already underwent treatment. One pundit not involved in the new study also questioned the choice of patients in the previous research.
So "There's a lot of bias with that because you tend to operate on patients you think might do well to begin with," said Dr Stephanie Bernik, head of surgical oncology at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "We positively need more evidence to guide us". To rack up that evidence, researchers randomly assigned 350 women who responded to their initial chemotherapy to one of two courses of treatment. The victory group had surgery followed by radiation to remove the first breast tumor and lymph nodes under the arms.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)