E-mail reminder to the survey

E-mail reminder to the survey.
Both electronic and mailed reminders balm help some patients to get colorectal cancer screenings, two new studies show. One bone up included 1103 patients, aged 50 to 75, at a group preparation who were overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Half of them received a single electronic message from their doctor, along with a connector to a Web-based tool to assess their risk for colorectal cancer. The other patients acted as a check group and did not receive any electronic messages viamax male enhancement oil toll free number. One month later, the screening rates were 8,3 percent for patients who received the electronic reminders and 0,2 percent in the knob group.

But the remainder was no longer significant after four months - 15,8 percent vs 13,1 percent. Among the 552 patients who received the electronic message, 54 percent viewed it and 9 percent second-hand the Web-based assessment tool startvigrxplus top. About one-fifth of the patients who utilized the assessment sucker were estimated to have a higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer.

Patients who used the risk tool were more right to get screened. "Patients have expressed interest in interacting with their medical record using electronic portals alike to the one used in our intervention," wrote Dr Thomas D Sequist, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and colleagues, in a release release.

And "Further research is needed to be conversant with the most effective ways for patients to use interactive health information technology to improve their care and to decrease the morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer".The second study included 628 patients, superannuated 50 to 79, who had an expired order for a screening colonoscopy. Half of the patients were mailed a prompt letter from their doctor, a brochure and a DVD about colorectal cancer and the screening process. They also received a backup telephone call.

The other patients were assigned to a control group that received usual care. Three months after the mailings, 9,9 percent of patients in the intervention corps and 3,2 percent of patients in the pilot group had undergone colorectal cancer screening. After six months, the rates were 18,2 percent and 12,1 percent.

So "Because the screening be worthy of remained low, additional probing is needed to determine how to best promote screening in this patient group," concluded Kenzie A Cameron and colleagues at Feinburg School of Medicine and Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, in a low-down release wmn thts looking for a men whos seroius watsap no an. "At present, vigorousness systems could reasonably determine to begin screening promotion with low-cost interventions like simple mailings followed by more expensive, but potentially more effectivem, interventions such as one-on-one steadfast navigation or interventions aimed at eliminating structural barriers for patients who stay put unscreened," they concluded.