Radiation Treatment Of Prostate Cancer.
Smoking doubles the chances that a prostate cancer lenient will comprehend his disease spread and that he will eventually die from his illness, a new look finds. "Basically we found that people who smoke had a higher risk of their tumor coming back, of it spreading and, ultimately, even expiring of prostate cancer," said study co-author Dr Michael Zelefsky. He is villainy chair of clinical research in the department of radiation oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City north carolina. "But interestingly, this applied only to 'current smokers' who were smoking around the duration they received surface beam therapy," Zelefsky added, referring to the flag form of radiation treatment for prostate cancer.
So "Former smokers did not have the increased hazard for disease spread and recurrence that current smokers did. "However, we also looked at how smoking influenced treatment side effects," from the radiation treatment, which can include rectal bleeding and/or constant and urgent urination hgh drops. "And we saw that both patients who smoked and former smokers seemed to have a higher jeopardize of urinary-related side effects after therapy".
Zelefsky and his colleagues reported the findings online Jan 27, 2015 in the paper BJU International. The research team aciculiform out that 19 percent of American adults smoke. To explore the impact of smoking yesterday on prostate cancer treatment and progression, the study authors focused on nearly 2400 patients who underwent care for prostate cancer between 1988 and 2005. Nearly 50 percent were identified as "former smokers," even if they had only kicked their practice shortly before beginning cancer treatment.
Disease progression, relapse, symptoms and deaths were all tracked for an general of eight years, as were all reactions to the radiation treatment. The researchers predetermined that the likelihood of surviving prostate cancer for a decade without experiencing any disease recurrence was about 66 percent to each patients who had never smoked. By comparison, that figure fell to 52 percent middle patients who were current smokers.
Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts
Thursday 9 May 2019
Sunday 28 April 2019
Surgery to treat rectal cancer
Surgery to treat rectal cancer.
For many rectal cancer patients, the view of surgery is a worrisome reality, given that the motion can significantly impair both bowel and sexual function. However, a changed study reveals that some cancer patients may fare just as well by forgoing surgery in favor of chemotherapy/radiation and "watchful waiting". The judgement is based on a review of data from 145 rectal cancer patients, all of whom had been diagnosed with echelon I, II or III disease full report. All had chemotherapy and radiation.
But about half had surgery while the others staved off the operation in favor of rigorous tracking of their disease spread - sometimes called "watchful waiting proextender price in china. We believe that our results will encourage more doctors to chew over this 'watch-and-wait' approach in patients with clinical complete response as an alternative to immediate rectal surgery, at least for some patients," superior study author Dr Philip Paty said in a news programme release from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
For many rectal cancer patients, the view of surgery is a worrisome reality, given that the motion can significantly impair both bowel and sexual function. However, a changed study reveals that some cancer patients may fare just as well by forgoing surgery in favor of chemotherapy/radiation and "watchful waiting". The judgement is based on a review of data from 145 rectal cancer patients, all of whom had been diagnosed with echelon I, II or III disease full report. All had chemotherapy and radiation.
But about half had surgery while the others staved off the operation in favor of rigorous tracking of their disease spread - sometimes called "watchful waiting proextender price in china. We believe that our results will encourage more doctors to chew over this 'watch-and-wait' approach in patients with clinical complete response as an alternative to immediate rectal surgery, at least for some patients," superior study author Dr Philip Paty said in a news programme release from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
Thursday 10 January 2019
Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation
Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are speciality on parents to strike esteemed heed to the safety of their children's eyes this summer. Although eye guard is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest eye haleness and safety organization, warns that children are particularly vulnerable to the harmful ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) injure that can accompany sun exposure frekuensi satelit yamal 300k jangkauan australia. For one, children as a rule spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the organization highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary decision that the lenses of young eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal leaking to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We need to remember to tend our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a hearsay release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are extraordinarily dangerous capsules. We can encourage our children to wear the proper taste protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the onset of cataracts, macular degeneration and a large array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that the whole world who goes out in the sun should wear sunglasses that block out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB diffusion - noting that sunglasses without such protection can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more damage than good. A wide-brimmed hat or cap also offers some measure of eye protection, the guild suggested.
With specific respect to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to make sure that sunglasses fit their child's face properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The dispose points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally screen the skin immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are speciality on parents to strike esteemed heed to the safety of their children's eyes this summer. Although eye guard is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest eye haleness and safety organization, warns that children are particularly vulnerable to the harmful ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) injure that can accompany sun exposure frekuensi satelit yamal 300k jangkauan australia. For one, children as a rule spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the organization highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary decision that the lenses of young eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal leaking to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We need to remember to tend our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a hearsay release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are extraordinarily dangerous capsules. We can encourage our children to wear the proper taste protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the onset of cataracts, macular degeneration and a large array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that the whole world who goes out in the sun should wear sunglasses that block out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB diffusion - noting that sunglasses without such protection can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more damage than good. A wide-brimmed hat or cap also offers some measure of eye protection, the guild suggested.
With specific respect to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to make sure that sunglasses fit their child's face properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The dispose points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally screen the skin immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
Sunday 14 August 2016
Mammography Is Against The Lifetime Risk Of Breast Cancer
Mammography Is Against The Lifetime Risk Of Breast Cancer.
The imminent cancer chance that radiation from mammograms might cause is slight compared to the benefits of lives saved from pioneer detection, new Canadian research says. The study is published online and will appear in the January 2011 facsimile issue of Radiology. This risk of radiation-induced soul cancers "is mentioned periodically by women and people who are critiquing screening and how often it should be done and in whom," said look at author Dr Martin J Yaffe, a senior scientist in imaging examination at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and a professor in the departments of medical biophysics and medical imaging at the University of Toronto. "This think over says that the good obtained from having a screening mammogram far exceeds the peril you might have from the radiation received from the low-dose mammogram," said Dr Arnold J Rotter, boss of the computed tomography section and a clinical professor of radiology at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Duarte, Calif.
Yaffe and his colleague, Dr James G Mainprize, developed a precise ne plus ultra to estimate the risk of radiation-induced breast cancer following exposure to shedding from mammograms, and then estimated the number of breast cancers, fatal breast cancers and years of sentience lost attributable to the mammography's screening radiation. They plugged into the model a typical emanation dose for digital mammography, 3,7 milligrays (mGy), and applied it to 100000 hypothetical women, screened annually between the ages of 40 and 55 and then every other year between the ages of 56 and 74.
They intended what the endanger would be from the radiation over time and took into account other causes of death. "We used an flawless risk model". That is, it computes "if a certain number of people get a unquestionable amount of radiation, down the road a certain number of cancers will be caused".
The imminent cancer chance that radiation from mammograms might cause is slight compared to the benefits of lives saved from pioneer detection, new Canadian research says. The study is published online and will appear in the January 2011 facsimile issue of Radiology. This risk of radiation-induced soul cancers "is mentioned periodically by women and people who are critiquing screening and how often it should be done and in whom," said look at author Dr Martin J Yaffe, a senior scientist in imaging examination at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and a professor in the departments of medical biophysics and medical imaging at the University of Toronto. "This think over says that the good obtained from having a screening mammogram far exceeds the peril you might have from the radiation received from the low-dose mammogram," said Dr Arnold J Rotter, boss of the computed tomography section and a clinical professor of radiology at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Duarte, Calif.
Yaffe and his colleague, Dr James G Mainprize, developed a precise ne plus ultra to estimate the risk of radiation-induced breast cancer following exposure to shedding from mammograms, and then estimated the number of breast cancers, fatal breast cancers and years of sentience lost attributable to the mammography's screening radiation. They plugged into the model a typical emanation dose for digital mammography, 3,7 milligrays (mGy), and applied it to 100000 hypothetical women, screened annually between the ages of 40 and 55 and then every other year between the ages of 56 and 74.
They intended what the endanger would be from the radiation over time and took into account other causes of death. "We used an flawless risk model". That is, it computes "if a certain number of people get a unquestionable amount of radiation, down the road a certain number of cancers will be caused".
Saturday 25 June 2016
Patients With Cancer Choose Surgery
Patients With Cancer Choose Surgery.
People with language cancer who go through surgery before receiving radiation treatment fare better than those who start treatment with chemotherapy, according to a small reborn study. Many patients may be hesitant to begin their treatment with an invasive procedure, University of Michigan researchers noted. But advanced surgical techniques can repair patients' chances for survival, the authors acclaimed in a university news release. The study was published online Dec 26, 2013 in JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Nearly 14000 Americans will be diagnosed with voice cancer this year and 2,070 will go the way of all flesh from the disease, according to the American Cancer Society. "To a prepubescent person with tongue cancer, chemotherapy may sound like a better option than surgery with extensive reconstruction," studio author Dr Douglas Chepeha, a professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of Michigan Medical School, said in the rumour release. "But patients with oral space cancer can't tolerate induction chemotherapy as well as they can handle surgery with follow-up radiation".
And "Our techniques of reconstruction are advanced and provide patients better survival and functional outcomes". The investigation involved 19 people with advanced oral cavity mouth cancer. All of the participants were given an first dose of chemotherapy (called "induction" chemotherapy). Patients whose cancer was reduced in expanse by 50 percent received more chemotherapy as well as radiation therapy.
People with language cancer who go through surgery before receiving radiation treatment fare better than those who start treatment with chemotherapy, according to a small reborn study. Many patients may be hesitant to begin their treatment with an invasive procedure, University of Michigan researchers noted. But advanced surgical techniques can repair patients' chances for survival, the authors acclaimed in a university news release. The study was published online Dec 26, 2013 in JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Nearly 14000 Americans will be diagnosed with voice cancer this year and 2,070 will go the way of all flesh from the disease, according to the American Cancer Society. "To a prepubescent person with tongue cancer, chemotherapy may sound like a better option than surgery with extensive reconstruction," studio author Dr Douglas Chepeha, a professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of Michigan Medical School, said in the rumour release. "But patients with oral space cancer can't tolerate induction chemotherapy as well as they can handle surgery with follow-up radiation".
And "Our techniques of reconstruction are advanced and provide patients better survival and functional outcomes". The investigation involved 19 people with advanced oral cavity mouth cancer. All of the participants were given an first dose of chemotherapy (called "induction" chemotherapy). Patients whose cancer was reduced in expanse by 50 percent received more chemotherapy as well as radiation therapy.
Friday 16 May 2014
Cancer Risk From CT Scans Lower Than Previously Thought
Cancer Risk From CT Scans Lower Than Previously Thought.
The endanger of developing cancer as a sequel of radiation exposure from CT scans may be mark down than previously thought, new research suggests. That finding, scheduled to be presented Wednesday at the annual junction of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago, is based on an eight-year critique of Medicare records covering nearly 11 million patients. "What we found is that overall between two and four out of every 10000 patients who submit to a CT scan are at risk for developing secondary cancers as a result of that emanation exposure," said Aabed Meer, an MD candidate in the department of radiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif. "And that risk, I would say, is belittle than we expected it to be," said Meer.
As a result, patients who lack a CT scan should not be fearful of the consequences, Meer stated. "If you have a hint and need a CT scan of the head, the benefits of that scan at that mo outweigh the very minor possibility of developing a cancer as a result of the scan itself," he explained. "CT scans do awesome things in terms of diagnosis. Yes, there is some radiation risk. But that tight-fisted risk should always be put in context".
The authors set out to quantify that risk by sifting through the medical records of elderly patients covered by Medicare between 1998 and 2005. The researchers separated the matter into two periods: 1998 to 2001 and 2002 to 2005. In the earlier period, 42 percent of the patients had undergone CT scans. For the term 2002 to 2005, that mould rose to 49 percent, which was not surprising given the increasing use of scans in US medical care.
Within each group, the enquiry group reviewed the number and type of CT scans administered to see how many patients received low-dose shedding (50 to 100 millisieverts) and how many got high-dose radiation (more than 100 millisieverts). They then estimated how many cancers were induced using paragon cancer risk models.
The endanger of developing cancer as a sequel of radiation exposure from CT scans may be mark down than previously thought, new research suggests. That finding, scheduled to be presented Wednesday at the annual junction of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago, is based on an eight-year critique of Medicare records covering nearly 11 million patients. "What we found is that overall between two and four out of every 10000 patients who submit to a CT scan are at risk for developing secondary cancers as a result of that emanation exposure," said Aabed Meer, an MD candidate in the department of radiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif. "And that risk, I would say, is belittle than we expected it to be," said Meer.
As a result, patients who lack a CT scan should not be fearful of the consequences, Meer stated. "If you have a hint and need a CT scan of the head, the benefits of that scan at that mo outweigh the very minor possibility of developing a cancer as a result of the scan itself," he explained. "CT scans do awesome things in terms of diagnosis. Yes, there is some radiation risk. But that tight-fisted risk should always be put in context".
The authors set out to quantify that risk by sifting through the medical records of elderly patients covered by Medicare between 1998 and 2005. The researchers separated the matter into two periods: 1998 to 2001 and 2002 to 2005. In the earlier period, 42 percent of the patients had undergone CT scans. For the term 2002 to 2005, that mould rose to 49 percent, which was not surprising given the increasing use of scans in US medical care.
Within each group, the enquiry group reviewed the number and type of CT scans administered to see how many patients received low-dose shedding (50 to 100 millisieverts) and how many got high-dose radiation (more than 100 millisieverts). They then estimated how many cancers were induced using paragon cancer risk models.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)