Risky Drinking After Working Long Hours

Risky Drinking After Working Long Hours.
Working wish hours may jack up the risk for alcohol abuse, according to a new study of more than 300000 people from 14 countries. Researchers found that employees who worked more than 48 hours a week were almost 13 percent more expected to doch an dorris to excess than those who worked 48 hours or less recommended reading. "Although the risks were not very high, these findings suggest that some nation might be prone to coping with excess working hours by habits that are unhealthy, in this case by using alcohol above the recommended limits," said inspect author Marianna Virtanen, from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in Helsinki.

Risky drinking is considered to be more than 14 drinks a week for women and more than 21 drinks a week for men. Drinking this much may increment the endanger of health problems such as liver disease, cancer, stroke, sensibility disease and mental disorders, the researchers said. Virtanen believes that workers who snort to excess may be trying to cope with a variety of work-related ills read this. "I think the symptoms woman in the street try to alleviate with alcohol may include stress, depression, tiredness and sleep disturbances.

Virtanen was punctilious to say this study could only show an association between long work hours and risky drinking, not that working extended hours caused heavy drinking. "With this type of study, you can never fully prove the cause-and-effect relationship. The come in was published online Jan 13,2015 in the BMJ. "The journal supports the longstanding suspicion that many workers may be using alcohol as a mental and physical painkiller, and for smoothing the change from work to home," said Cassandra Okechukwu, author of an accompanying journal editorial.

Treat Glaucoma Before It Is Too Late

Treat Glaucoma Before It Is Too Late.
Alan Leighton discovered he had glaucoma when he noticed a gray yard of discern in his left eye. That was in 1992. "I over I had it a long time before that, but I didn't know until then," said Leighton, 68, a corporate treasurer who lives in Indianapolis. "Glaucoma is groove on that. It's sneaky".

Leighton made an nomination with his ophthalmologist to see what was wrong. "We went for a bunch of tests, and he ascertained there was an issue with that eye, and that I had normal pressure glaucoma".

His response was unsentimental and pragmatic: His subdivision has a history of glaucoma, so the news wasn't a total surprise. "I stony that we needed to take the most proactive methods we could. I would go to the best people I could find and woo what methods they had to address it and keep it from getting worse. I wanted to keep it from affecting my right eye, which was somewhat clear. I didn't know what the process was going to be to actually stop the glaucoma or trouble it, if it was even possible. I don't know if there was a lot of emotion involved. It was more like, 'Hey, what can we do about this?'".

He asked if there was any fashion to restore the sight he'd lost, and the answer was no. "They unbelievably much said that gray area in my left eye was going to stay there, and there was no occasion to do any procedures to effectively change that. It had something to do with the optic nerve".